Single-use instrumentation, the guarantee of surgical safety:
  • Elimination of any risk of contamination from poorly sterilised surgical instruments;
  • Total safety that comes from completely new instruments for each patient;
  • Precision and comfort for the surgeon in performing operations.
 
  Comparison Single-Use/ Reusable
  Reusable instruments Single-use instruments
Purchase Cost
Purchase Cost Large number of boxes required per operating day Starting cost+/ - : €30,000 Cost similar to a sterilisation procedure
Price per instrument Prohibitive cost: Approx. €250 per instrument Between €10 and€20, depending on instrument
Replacement of damaged instruments 1 or 2 clamps per operating day Never
Sterilisation Costs
Purchase cost of sterilisation equipment Approx. €100,000 depending on equipment None
Staff costs 2 hrs of handling per tray None
Staff time investment
Sterilisation Approx. 2 hrs per cycle, depending on equipment None
Decontamination (ultrasound, rinsing, etc.) 45 minutes per tray None
Sterilisation Efficiency
Ultimate sterilisation efficiency Risk of handling error Guaranteed 100% (gamma ray)
Packing Manual Industrial
Material Bag PETG+Tyvek blister pack
Certification
EC Marking Yes Yes
ISO13485 Yes Yes
Surgical Performance
Instrument precision Variable Perfect
Handling Complex routing from sterilisation area (sometimes off-site) Complete 10-pack kit available in the operating room
Surgery scheduling Depends on number of boxes of instruments on hand 100% of time can be devoted to the operation
 

In the hospital environment, the utilisation of single-use instrumentation therefore provides the following advantages:
  • Elimination of any risk of contamination for patients, healthcare staff and surgeons, conveyed by surgical instruments;
  • Re-deployment of human resources (nursing staff) freed from re-sterilisation tasks;
  • Equality of costs and reduction of expenses (after re-deployment of staff);
  • Safety and reliability.
  Questions to an ophthalmic professional about sterilisation-related risks

>> What do you think of sterilisation in the hospital environment?
Several steps are required for decontamination and sterilisation. Despite the modernisation of equipment and strict observance of procedures, the re-sterilisation of surgical micro-instruments continues to give rise to possible reliability problems, particularly when risk-exposed surgery is involved, regardless of the quality of the facility where the operation is performed.

Moreover, the micro-instruments that we use in ophthalmology are high precision and very fragile and do not hold up well when exposed to manual disinfecting processes (deterioration, loss of precision...).

>> What are the repercussions of these methods when you are performing surgery?
The discovery of bent or deteriorated instruments, just when an operation is about to take place, puts us in a difficult position with our patient and may pose a risk for surgical procedures. It is also obvious that the
various manual stages of the sterilisation process, considering the sensitivity of the eyeball, may cause minor or major infections that can lead to a risk of blindness.

>> Given such risks, what are the benefits of disposable instruments?
Today, thanks to these disposable micro-instruments, we know that new instruments are disposed of after each operation, thereby enabling us to ensure rigorous precision for this
type of surgery.
These instruments are clean and sterile, have never used before and guarantee 100%
surgical safety for our operations.